<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>        <rss version="2.0"
             xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
             xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
             xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
             xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
             xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
             xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
        <channel>
            <title>
									Retrotroniks Forum - Recent Topics				            </title>
            <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/</link>
            <description>Retrotroniks Discussion Board</description>
            <language>en-US</language>
            <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 23:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
            <generator>wpForo</generator>
            <ttl>60</ttl>
							                    <item>
                        <title>UI Changes</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/ui-changes/</link>
                        <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 16:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,
I am wrapping up the OSX version of the new GUI very soon and the other OSs soon after. I have one question to ask that I believe I know thew answer to but I would like to h...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,</p>
<p>I am wrapping up the OSX version of the new GUI very soon and the other OSs soon after. I have one question to ask that I believe I know thew answer to but I would like to have your opinions. Sometimes when you are working on something like this certain features might seem to fit or might make sense while developing that don't really do anything for the real end-user. So, I recently decided to make room for more technical features by removing the settings menu page and removing the code and strings section of the chip information screen. It will now show the info as soon as you select the chip and you simply need to click button 2 to test once on that screen.</p>
<p>You will still be able to control everything in the settings from the new GUI app. So, the features will still be there they just won't be hogging up Vetus' display menu. </p>
<p>How does everyone feel about that? My assumption in that no one ever uses anything from the settings more than maybe once or twice and the benefits from doing it this way far exceed whatever downsides there are (if any). I'd love to hear your opinions. </p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>-Kelvin </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>NIVBOT</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/ui-changes/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Free 30 pin SIMM boards</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/free-30-pin-simm-boards/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hey guys,
I have five 30 pin SIMM prototype boards that are built and I&#039;m not going to sell because the new version will actually show up as being connected in Vetus Pars. The five I have w...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey guys,</p>
<p>I have five 30 pin SIMM prototype boards that are built and I'm not going to sell because the new version will actually show up as being connected in Vetus Pars. The five I have won't do that. It will only show up as unknown or the like. However, it will still function exactly the same. So if you'd like one you can have one just pay for shipping. I only have five though so first come first served. E-mail me at kelvin@retrotroniks.com. I'll look up the cost to ship for ya. Have a good weekend.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<div id="wpfa-400" class="wpforo-attached-file"><a class="wpforo-default-attachment" href="//retrotroniks.com/wp-content/uploads/wpforo/default_attachments/1782507887-30pin.jpg" target="_blank" title="30pin.jpg"><i class="fas fa-paperclip"></i>&nbsp;30pin.jpg</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>NIVBOT</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/free-30-pin-simm-boards/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>How are VDD/GND assigned for a type=6 (&quot;other&quot;) chip?</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/how-are-vdd-gnd-assigned-for-a-type6-other-chip/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 03:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[There&#039;s no field in the GUI to mark which pins are supply and ground. For RAM/logic parts the tester clearly powers the right pins on its own, but with a type=6 part (an 18-pin MSM6242B RTC,...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's no field in the GUI to mark which pins are supply and ground. For RAM/logic parts the tester clearly powers the right pins on its own, but with a type=6 part (an 18-pin MSM6242B RTC, VDD on pin 18, GND on pin 9) I'm measuring pin 18 floating — average wanders between ~0.9 and 2 V, never a steady rail. So: how does Vetus decide which pins get VDD/GND for "other"? Is it derived from pin count, from type, or is power simply not driven for "other" unless specified somewhere?</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>arnljot</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/how-are-vdd-gnd-assigned-for-a-type6-other-chip/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Is the ZIF supply voltage (VDD) fixed, or can it be set per chip?</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/is-the-zif-supply-voltage-vdd-fixed-or-can-it-be-set-per-chip/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 01:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hardware question while bringing up a test for an OKI MSM6242B RTC. I scoped the chip&#039;s supply pin (pin 18, VDD) with a test running and it reads ~3.62 V, not the 5 V I&#039;d assumed. The part i...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">Hardware question while bringing up a test for an OKI MSM6242B RTC. I scoped the chip's supply pin (pin 18, VDD) with a test running and it reads ~3.62 V, not the 5 V I'd assumed. The part itself is fine from 2–6 V, so that's not a problem on its own — but it matters because this chip only enables its bus interface when CS1 sits above 4/5·VDD, so I need to know the exact rail to reason about input thresholds.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">So: is the VDD that Vetus drives onto the ZIF a fixed value, or can it be selected per chip (e.g. 5 V vs 3.3 V)? If it's fixed, what's the nominal target, and is ~3.6 V expected under load? And are the digital I/O high levels driven from that same rail, or from a separate (e.g. 3.3 V) logic supply? Trying to figure out whether I should be testing this part at a lower VDD on purpose.</p>
<p class="font-claude-response-body break-words whitespace-normal">Thanks!</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>arnljot</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/is-the-zif-supply-voltage-vdd-fixed-or-can-it-be-set-per-chip/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Missing documentation CLKST and CLKSTP</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-coding/missing-documentation-clkst-and-clkstp/</link>
                        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 00:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[It would be nice to know what frequency they send, if it&#039;s meaningful to use for ICs that use a clock.
I have a small collection of OKI clock chips, would be nice to put a little green stic...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be nice to know what frequency they send, if it's meaningful to use for ICs that use a clock.</p>
<p>I have a small collection of OKI clock chips, would be nice to put a little green sticker on them :)</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>arnljot</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-coding/missing-documentation-clkst-and-clkstp/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Technical drawing</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/technical-drawing/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 18:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hi,
Would you consider sharing a technical drawing of the mainboard with measurements and placements of the screw holes, switch, toggle buttons and usb socket.
This way it would be much fa...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Would you consider sharing a technical drawing of the mainboard with measurements and placements of the screw holes, switch, toggle buttons and usb socket.</p>
<p>This way it would be much faster to quickly design case for it so that one doesn't have to pull out the calipers  &#x1f609; </p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>arnljot</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/technical-drawing/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>How are things?</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/how-are-things/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 17:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Hello everyone,
May seems to have been a very slow month on the forums and pretty much every other place. That being said, I just want to know if anyone has any issues, questions, concerns,...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello everyone,</p>
<p>May seems to have been a very slow month on the forums and pretty much every other place. That being said, I just want to know if anyone has any issues, questions, concerns, praise? Haha, anyway, I’d love to hear how you guys are liking Vetus Pars and what you’ve done with it and if there are any improvements you’d like to see. Any special chips you’d like a board for? Anything at all.<br />I’m still working daily on improvements and new addons. The new GUIs and first add-ons are coming soon. Hang in there </p>
<p>upcoming in the next several weeks should be at least the OSX version of the GUI with the others following soon after and the 30 pin SIMM tester board. </p>
<p>-Kelvin</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>NIVBOT</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/how-are-things/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>Firmware Update 1.0.4</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/retro_forum/firmware-update-1-0-4/</link>
                        <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 04:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[There is a new firmware update. It is very important. It fixes a bug that can cause mixed up strings. Highly recommended to update at the downloads page. 
&nbsp;]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a new firmware update. It is very important. It fixes a bug that can cause mixed up strings. Highly recommended to update at the downloads page. </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>NIVBOT</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/retro_forum/firmware-update-1-0-4/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>vp-Tools and Website almost ready</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-coding/vp-tools-and-website-almost-ready/</link>
                        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 01:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[Status update
The website is mostly done in dark mode, and I&#039;m still working on light mode.  
A very basic Forum is also now online for tech support.   It also allow to the poster to pick t...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Status update</p>
<p>The website is mostly done in dark mode, and I'm still working on light mode.   https://caffeinatedbytes.com</p>
<p>A very basic Forum is also now online for tech support.   It also allow to the poster to pick the best solution.</p>
<p>vp-Tools seems to be working (vp-chip, vp-asm, vp-flash and vp-man) and successfully communicate the the backend to download, search, flash chips, etc.</p>
<p>Everything still needs testing.   I still need to do some small things like make user friendly error messages instead of exception messages for things like flashing when not in USB mode, or when the wrong COM port is selected.</p>
<p>I'm away for the next 4 days but when I return I will be granting @nivbot access to download the tools for betatesting.   If he approves I will open it up to a couple more serious testers to try out the command line tools.   </p>
<p>My goal is to also add a screen to the website to examine chips online as well as an option for vp-chip to upload chips to share with others.  I'll do that when the current vp-tools is out of betatesting.</p>
<p>I have a day job and a part time company in my spare time so progress on this project has been slow and was started impulsively.   I think the Vetus Pars is an amazing tool and I want to help get it known out there so it has a chance to compete with the other overpriced tools.    A word to Canadians, after the exchange rate and duty fees and tax it's over $200, and is still less than half the price of Retro chip tester.   Someday I want to buy a second one to mess around putting it in a 3d printed case, but I'm going to wait until the Canadian dollar is stronger.</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>rbourque</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-coding/vp-tools-and-website-almost-ready/</guid>
                    </item>
				                    <item>
                        <title>SEND TO VETUS = OK, SAVE TO VETUS = ISSUES</title>
                        <link>https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/send-to-vetus-ok-save-to-vetus-issues/</link>
                        <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2026 00:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
                        <description><![CDATA[I have a good sized .chip file that is a work-in-progress that I can get to SEND TO successfully and run (or at least appears to, hunting down a logic error in the code), but when I SAVE TO,...]]></description>
                        <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a good sized .chip file that is a work-in-progress that I can get to SEND TO successfully and run (or at least appears to, hunting down a logic error in the code), but when I SAVE TO, VetusGUI returns that it completed the save successfully way to soon. First I was thinking Vetus hardware was being efficient and saving the SEND TO version since there were no changes... However, the test does not show in the menu on the hardware.</p>
<p>When I REFRESH to pull the current list, there is a blank file at the bottom of the list in VetusGUI. If I load that from the hardware into VetusGUI, I will get either the correct Code, Chip Name, Num Pins, Chip Type, and Image fields but the String# fields will all be empty or have invalid characters in them - OR - I will get nothing.</p>
<p>A full reboot of the hardware, close/open of VetusGUI and doing a direct SAVE TO results in the same type of behavior. </p>
<p>I'm on Windows 11, I have updated the hardware to 1.0.3. I have other much smaller test chip files that saved and run without issue.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></content:encoded>
						                            <category domain="https://retrotroniks.com/community/"></category>                        <dc:creator>Midwest Mac</dc:creator>
                        <guid isPermaLink="true">https://retrotroniks.com/community/vetus-pars-help/send-to-vetus-ok-save-to-vetus-issues/</guid>
                    </item>
							        </channel>
        </rss>
		